Corpus Agentis
The field book to agent ecosystems
The field book to agent ecosystems
Design · Topologies

Classify · Confirm · Dispatch (CCD)

Scalarity's signature control topology. Brain classifies intent as a structured tool_call (the only LLM step). One dedicated confirmation turn gates the transition, human-in-the-loop or programmatic. Dispatch is 100% deterministic code with the safety gate embedded inside, no LLM in the write path. Capability grows by adding routes, not by branching code.

Classify · Confirm · Dispatch (CCD) agent topology diagram

Classify, Confirm, Dispatch (CCD) is the Field Guide's signature control topology. The reasoning core does one job, classify the user's intent into a structured call, and then two deterministic stages take over: a confirm stage gates the action, a human or a rule approving the structured call before anything fires, and a dispatch stage executes it deterministically from the approved call, never from a fresh model inference. The safety gate lives in code, not in the model, so the agent's power scales by adding routes while approval-before-writes stays a law. In anatomy terms the model is a classifier feeding a deterministic confirm-and-dispatch spine.

In the anatomy

The reasoning core classifies intent into a structured call; a deterministic confirm stage (human-in-the-loop or rule) gates it; a dispatch stage executes from the gated call rather than a new inference; the perimeter is the confirm stage.

At a glance
PatternClassify · Confirm · Dispatch (CCD)
State modelsession
ExampleScalarity Alfred · Nodal factory · CCD-authored agents
Common use cases
  • ·Production agents that must never act without approval.
  • ·Regulated or high-stakes workflows in finance, healthcare and operations.
  • ·Any deployment where the model proposes but a gate disposes.
Strengths
  • ·Safety by construction: the gate is deterministic code, not model judgment.
  • ·Scales by adding routes, not by branching logic.
  • ·Auditable: every action traces to an approved structured call.
  • ·Separates the model's fallible classification from reliable execution.
Weaknesses
  • ·The confirm gate adds a step, and sometimes a human, to every write.
  • ·Only as good as the intent classification feeding it.
  • ·Requires structured, enumerable actions up front.
  • ·Less suited to fully open-ended autonomy.
Basis
  • Scalarity, internal research · Agent Archetypes v2

Description, use cases and trade-offs: Field Book analysis, synthesised from established agent-architecture literature.